Skip to main content

Building AI Agents: A Software Engineering Challenge, Not Just ML

· 6 min read
Adrian Escutia
A Rebel with a Cause, Innovating the Future

AI agents are becoming essential for automation, decision-making, and intelligent task execution. While some envision a future where AI autonomously builds its own agents, the current reality is different. Today, building effective AI agents is still a software engineering challenge - one that requires careful design, the right frameworks, and seamless system integration.

The misconception? Many believe that AI agents require machine learning expertise. But in reality, building AI agents is more like developing microservices - it's about structuring software components, defining APIs, and ensuring smooth communication between systems.

Mobile AppBrowserAPIGATEWAYRESTStorefrontWebAppWEBAccountServiceRESTInventoryServiceRESTShippingServiceRESTAccount DBInventory DBShipping DB

In this post, we'll break down how AI agents work, why you don't need ML to build them, how to integrate them with existing systems using Model Context Protocol (MCP), and how to avoid common pitfalls like spaghetti code when developing agentic architectures.


Understanding AI Agents: More Software Engineering Than ML

AI agents are software components that act autonomously based on inputs from users, data sources, or other systems. They can handle tasks such as:

  • Automating workflows (e.g., AI copilots in DevOps)
  • Interacting with APIs and databases
  • Performing decision-making based on predefined rules or AI models
  • Responding to user prompts (like ChatGPT, but customized for specific use cases)

But here's the catch: not all AI agents require machine learning or deep learning. Many can be designed using rule-based logic, deterministic workflows, and structured APIs - just like how traditional enterprise software is built.

This is where the microservices analogy makes sense. AI agents, much like microservices, work as independent components that need well-defined boundaries, modular design, and effective communication mechanisms to function effectively.

AI Agents vs. Microservices: The Architectural Similarities

FeatureMicroservicesAI Agents
ModularitySmall, independent servicesSmall, task-specific AI agents
CommunicationAPI-based (REST, gRPC, etc.)API-based (chat interfaces, MCP, etc.) ⭐
State ManagementStateless or statefulOften stateless but can maintain context
ScalabilityScales horizontallyCan spawn multiple agent instances
DeploymentContainerized, serverless, or on-premContainerized, serverless, or embedded in applications

Like microservices, AI agents can be composed together to form larger, more complex AI-driven solutions. The key to success? Choosing the right framework and integration method - which brings us to Model Context Protocol (MCP).


Model Context Protocol (MCP): The Key to Seamless AI Integration

One of the biggest roadblocks to AI adoption in enterprises is integration with existing systems. Most companies operate legacy software, ERP systems, and internal APIs that aren't AI-ready. Without a proper integration layer, AI agents remain disconnected from the tools they're meant to enhance.

What is MCP?

Model Context Protocol (MCP) is a framework that allows AI models to integrate with your existing software infrastructure, acting as an intermediary between LLMs and enterprise systems.

It enables:

  • Context-aware AI interactions: AI agents can pull relevant data from internal systems before generating responses.
  • Secure access to back-office APIs: Ensuring AI agents operate within predefined boundaries.
  • Standardized communication: Reducing the complexity of AI model interactions with structured systems.

With MCP, businesses don't need to rebuild their infrastructure from scratch - they can expose existing interfaces to AI models in a controlled and scalable way.

Why MCP is a Game-Changer for AI Agents

Let's take an example, following the same analogy of AI agents as microservices.

✳️ Claudefor Desktop🪶LibreChatAPIGATEWAYMCPStorefrontToolsMCPAccountToolsMCPInventoryToolsMCPShippingToolsMCPAccount DBInventory DBShipping DB

Imagine you're building an AI-powered customer support agent for a bank. Without MCP, you'd have to:

  1. Hardcode API calls for every possible banking function (balance inquiry, transaction history, loan applications, etc.).
  2. Build a custom middleware to authenticate and manage interactions between AI and backend systems.
  3. Maintain constant updates to ensure compatibility with evolving APIs.

With MCP, the AI agent can:
Understand the API structure dynamically and adapt its requests accordingly.
Authenticate securely without exposing sensitive credentials.
Interact with back-office systems without complex custom development.

Essentially, MCP reduces friction between AI models and business applications, making it easier to deploy, scale, and maintain AI agents in real-world environments.


Avoiding Spaghetti Code in AI Agent Development

One of the biggest risks in AI development is poor architecture. Many teams rush to build AI agents without considering scalability, maintainability, and modularity. The result? Spaghetti code - a tangled mess of scripts, dependencies, and workarounds that becomes a nightmare to maintain.

Common Pitfalls in AI Agent Development

  1. Hardcoded API Calls

    • Instead of dynamically adapting to system changes, some AI agents rely on static, hardcoded API endpoints.
    • Solution: Use an abstraction layer (like MCP) to ensure flexibility.
  2. Lack of Modularization

    • Many AI implementations mix business logic, AI interactions, and system integrations in a single codebase.
    • Solution: Follow separation of concerns - keep AI logic separate from system integration layers.
  3. Overcomplicating State Management

    • AI agents don't always need complex memory management.
    • Solution: For simple use cases, keep AI agents stateless and use external storage for context retention.
  4. Ignoring Security & Compliance

    • AI systems dealing with sensitive data need strict access controls and logging.
    • Solution: Implement proper authentication and monitor AI interactions with internal systems.

The Right Toolset for Scalable AI Agents

To avoid these issues, consider adopting well-structured frameworks and tools for building AI agents:

CategoryRecommended Tool/Framework
Agent FrameworksLangChain, LlamaIndex 🏗️
API IntegrationModel Context Protocol (MCP), OpenAPI 👈🏽
LLM HostingOpenAI, Hugging Face Inference API
OrchestrationTemporal, Prefect
ContainerizationDocker, Kubernetes

Choosing the right toolset prevents unnecessary complexity and ensures long-term maintainability.

Intent-Based AIfor MCP DesignMCP🔹 Model Context ProtocolProjectApplicationServerToolRuntimeServersToolToolToolToolBackend SystemsWeb ServicesWeb ServicesDatabasesFiles/FTP

For the API integration layer, consider using MCP to ensure your AI agents can communicate effectively with existing systems. Here is where Agentico comes in, and where I think I can help you. ✊🏽


Final Thoughts: AI Agents Are Software - Treat Them Like It

AI agents aren't just about machine learning - they're about good software engineering. If you think of AI tools as microservices, you'll naturally focus on modularity, clean architecture, and scalable integration.

Key Takeaways:

  • AI agents are software components, not just ML models.
  • Think microservices - build modular, API-driven architectures.
  • Use MCP to integrate AI agents with legacy and enterprise systems.
  • Avoid spaghetti code - design AI agents with maintainability in mind.

The AI revolution isn't just about better models - it's about better engineering. Build smart, scale effectively, and make AI work for your business.

What's your biggest challenge in building AI agents? Let's discuss in the comments!

Let' build the future together. Go Rebels! ✊🏽